Welcome to Russ McBee Sign in | Join | Help

Factoid about solar energy

Last evening, one of those strange questions came up that I'll spend an inordinate amount of time researching, just out of curiosity. The question was this:

If we tried to provide all the electricity the United States needs using only photovoltaic solar cells (where sunlight is converted directly into electricity), how much area would it cover?

I'm going to throw out some numbers, but bear with me.

This DOE spreadsheet says the 2005 electrical generating capacity of the entire United States was 1,067,000 megawatts; I got that by summing up the "Nameplate Capacity" column.

This DOE page shows a photovoltaic project in Arizona that uses 100,000 square feet of photovoltaic panels to produce 1 megawatt  of electricity.

To meet the entire electrical capacity of the country, then, we'd need 106,700,900,000 square feet of panels, which is 3,827 square miles; that's about 7.7 times the area of Knox County, or 5 times the area of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

I bet if we covered the roof of every building in the country with those panels, we'd have way more capacity than we needed. Of course, photovoltaic cells are expensive and require some exotic materials. According to this, the cost of those panels in Arizona was $2.86 per square foot. That'd be over $300 billion.

We need to find solutions that eliminate carbon dioxide emissions wherever possible; solar can't completely solve the problem, but a large-scale rollout of the technology would certainly help matters.

Share this post: Email | del.icio.us | Digg | Reddit
Published Friday, May 04, 2007 3:02 PM by
Filed under: ,

Comments

Friday, May 04, 2007 2:31 PM by R. Neal

# re: Factoid about solar energy

The trick with solar is to make it distributed. Rooftop solar panels, backyard solar farms, etc. More self-sufficient homes, buildings, campuses and such.

There has to be an efficient and environmentally friendly storage component to it, though, for nighttime and when the sun don't shine. Maybe generating hydrogen during peak times and storing it for reuse or something.

But solar lends itself to scalable solutions like this. Which is probably why there isn't a lot of R&D into improving the efficiency, lowering the cost, and other breakthrough science that could make it economically feasible.

(My idea to overcome this is to get the power and utility companies in the game by giving them franchises to develop, install and maintain and finance solar systems at homes and businesses.)

Friday, May 04, 2007 3:00 PM by

# re: Factoid about solar energy

I agree that battery/storage technology needs to improve, and I like the franchise idea. That might start weaning them from coal.

I can't find it right now, but I saw another page at that same DOE site that plotted the average cost of photovoltaic cells over time. The trend is definitely downward, but not as fast as it needs to be.

To prevent spam, anonymous comments are disabled. Click here to register for the site, or click here to sign in.